Mitigating the Risks of Poor ERP Investments: Strategies for Informed Decision-Making and Success
Name of the Student
The role of Information Systems (IS) is of utmost importance in shaping the functioning, decision-making processes, and goal attainment of companies in the contemporary, dynamic, and fiercely competitive corporate landscape. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems have emerged as significant instruments within the realm of information technology (IT), revolutionizing the manner in which organizations oversee their operations and allocate resources.
Information Systems (IS) encompass a diverse array of technologies and methodologies employed by companies to facilitate the acquisition, processing, storage, and dissemination of information. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, which fall under the umbrella of Information Systems (IS), offer comprehensive solutions that optimize and enhance several organizational functions, including finance, human resources, supply chain management, and customer interactions. Information systems (IS) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems offer a multitude of benefits, such as enhanced decision-making capabilities, heightened operational efficiency, improved data accuracy, and potential cost savings. These systems facilitate the ability of organizations to adjust to dynamic market conditions and foster sustainable growth over an extended period of time.
Although the advantages of information systems (IS) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are attractive, organizations must navigate a multifaceted environment filled with potential challenges and risks. The implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems requires thorough planning, strategic alignment, and effective change management. The failure to adhere to this practice can yield significant consequences, as evidenced by empirical instances such as Lidl, Hershey’s, and the United States Navy. Potential problems in the context of program adaptation include complications, concerns related to data migration, and opposition to organizational change.
This paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems and the associated risks they entail. The content encompasses literature reviews, analyses of case studies, evaluations of SAP and alternative solutions, as well as practical recommendations for organizations. This study aims to explore these components in order to furnish businesses with the requisite knowledge and insights necessary for mitigating the hazards associated with ill-advised investments in enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, while concurrently optimizing the utilization of information technologies.
Problems and benefits associated with Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) solutions have emerged as robust instruments for organizations in the contemporary dynamic business environment. These systems offer numerous benefits, with the most notable being their potential to revolutionize decision-making and process optimization within enterprises (Evans & Annunziata, 2012). Beneath this commitment, though, lies a complex landscape of challenges and potential.
The major focus of ERP systems lies in the endeavor to enhance decision-making processes. Nyckel (2020) asserts that these systems function as a digital hub, consolidating data from many sectors within a business. This integrated perspective offers decision-makers with up-to-date information, enabling the transformation of intuitive judgments into evidence-based conclusions. In the given situation, an individual holding the position of a sales executive is provided with an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) dashboard. This tool enables the sales executive to analyze real-time data pertaining to inventory levels, client demand trends, and sales estimates. Consequently, the sales executive is empowered to make precise adjustments to their plans based on the insights derived from the ERP dashboard.
Nevertheless, the journey towards gaining insight through ERP implementation is not without of challenges. Zhang and Zheng (2019) have identified many prevalent obstacles that companies encounter during their progression. The deployment of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems is characterized by a notable level of complexity. The procedure often requires significant customization in order to align with the specific goals of a company, leading to financial exceedances and time delays.
Moreover, the process of transferring data from legacy systems to an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system can be fraught with many challenges. The persistence of data quality concerns subsequent to implementation may raise uncertainties regarding the reliability of decision-making procedures. Employees may exhibit resistance towards the changes induced by the implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems. In light of the perceived disruption created by these technologies, it is plausible that resistance to change may manifest within the workforce.
The process of evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of enterprise resource planning (ERP) solutions requires meticulous deliberation. According to Otoom et al. (2019), it is imperative for organizations to establish clear objectives, assess the necessity for customization, and formulate a feasible budget and timeline. Change management is also emphasized. Mitigating employees’ worries and providing comprehensive training are crucial in minimizing resistance to change and, eventually, assuring the realization of the benefits associated with process optimization. Moreover, it is imperative to see the implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) as a process rather than a fixed outcome, as highlighted by Hustad et al. (2021). The consistent assessment and enhancement of system performance is of paramount importance in order to attain sustained benefits in the long run. Selecting the appropriate Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) vendor is of utmost importance. When making decisions, it is crucial to take into account the vendor’s reputation, level of support, and scalability..
Literature Review on Existing ERP Implementations
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems have been touted as a means to consolidate data, streamline processes, and provide timely analytics, all with the aim of enhancing decision-making and expediting business operations. Lidl, a German supermarket firm, endeavored to revamp its supply chain and procurement operations through an ambitious Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) project (Hapsatou, 2022). However, this ultimately resulted in a costly and distressing situation. Based on the available reports, the system was affected by data inconsistencies, resulting in disruptions in the supply chain, shortages of products, and substantial financial losses. This narrative serves as a poignant reminder of the intricate nature of enterprise resource planning (ERP) initiatives and the imperative requirement for precise data integrity. Furthermore, it underscores the pivotal role of change management in effectively managing extensive organizational upheavals.
According to Subramanian (2022), Hershey’s, the renowned American chocolate manufacturer, encountered challenges with the implementation of its Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system in both 1999 and 2018. The deployment of the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system in 1999 resulted in significant financial implications for the company, as it incurred a substantial loss of $100 million in sales. This was primarily attributed to challenges encountered in the areas of delivery and order processing, which were directly caused by the implementation of the ERP system. Hershey’s saw another setback linked to enterprise resource planning (ERP) more than twenty years later, as it was compelled to halt the implementation of its SAP system. The challenges at hand were further intensified by external factors, notably the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aforementioned instances underscore the significance of proficient project management, considerations about scalability, and adaptability in response to unexpected circumstances throughout the installation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems.
At a broader scope, the United States Navy’s extensive endeavor encountered substantial setbacks and financial overages. According to Moschler (2021), the Navy’s experience underscores the significance of implementing rigorous project governance, adhering to established best practices, and effectively managing project scope in order to mitigate the risks of cost overruns and schedule extensions. Developing a strategic strategy is necessary in order to propose improvement approaches based on these real-world experiences. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) programs necessitate a substantial allocation of time and effort towards meticulous planning and thorough analysis of requirements. It is imperative to possess a comprehensive comprehension of an organization’s specific requirements, procedures, and objectives. In order to ascertain essential prerequisites and possible challenges, it is imperative to involve important stakeholders right from the outset.
Moreover, the significance of efficient change management in enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems is steadily growing. The reluctance exhibited by employees towards change might provide significant challenges. In order to ensure a seamless transition, it is imperative for firms to develop robust change management strategies that encompass comprehensive training and communication initiatives. The importance of considering scalability should not be underestimated, particularly within the context of large-scale organizations. The evaluation of the selected Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system’s ability to accommodate the evolving and dynamic requirements of the company is of utmost importance. In order to effectively navigate unexpected challenges and changes within the corporate environment, it is imperative to develop and implement contingency plans.
The implementation of effective project governance and scope management is of utmost importance in mitigating potential challenges and issues that may arise throughout an ERP project. According to Jiménez et al. (2020), the implementation of well-defined project governance frameworks, the establishment of clear roles and responsibilities, and adherence to best practices are essential. The use of project scope monitoring and regulation can effectively mitigate the risks associated with scope creep, cost overruns, and schedule delays. Ultimately, it is imperative to regard the deployment of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) as an ongoing and iterative undertaking, rather than a singular occurrence. Establishing key performance indicators (KPIs) is of utmost importance in order to effectively monitor the effectiveness of enterprise resource planning (ERP) installations. Regular evaluations enable organizations to identify opportunities for development and optimization..
Critical evaluation of SAP and market alternatives
SAP has emerged as a prominent global frontrunner in the ever-changing landscape of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, offering organizations a comprehensive range of solutions aimed at optimizing operations, enhancing decision-making processes, and bolstering overall efficiency. Upon further examination, SAP exhibits a multifaceted amalgamation of advantages and constraints that organizations must carefully evaluate before to undertaking enterprise resource planning (ERP) initiatives.
The ascent of SAP in the enterprise resource planning (ERP) market may be attributed to several significant advantages that have garnered appeal among enterprises across various sizes and sectors. Perhaps the most notable advantage of this entity is the extensive scope of its operations. Jacobides (2022) asserts that SAP provides a comprehensive solution encompassing several organizational functions, including finance, supply chain management, human resources, and customer relationship management. The extensive scope of coverage facilitates the ability of enterprises to establish connections and integrate their operations, leading to enhanced visibility of data and coherence in processes.
One notable characteristic of SAP is its extensive worldwide presence, positioning it as a reliable collaborator for various sectors, including manufacturing and healthcare, while accommodating enterprises of diverse scales and intricacy. The extensive implementation of SAP contributes to the expansion of a broad and interconnected ecosystem that is populated by users and partners (Wirtz et al., 2022). The scalability of SAP is a critical attribute that holds significant importance for organizations across various scales. The system demonstrates equal proficiency in fulfilling the needs of both small and large multinational corporations. The capacity to scale allows organizations to confidently initiate their ERP implementation, as they are aware that SAP has the capability to grow and adjust according to their changing requirements.
The rich reporting and analytics capabilities of SAP represent an additional area of strength. According to Ahmad et al. (2020), the system offers a wide range of Business Intelligence (BI) solutions to users. In the contemporary landscape of highly competitive corporate environments, the utilization of data-driven decision-making has become a highly valued instrument for organizations. This approach enables enterprises to swiftly respond and adjust to changing trends and possibilities. SAP’s exceptional ability to integrate various systems and processes is an additional noteworthy achievement for the company. The software possesses integration capabilities that enable organizations to seamlessly incorporate SAP with various systems and technologies. The presence of interconnection fosters the facilitation of effective data flow, mitigates redundancy, and enhances the overall efficacy of organizational processes.
Although SAP offers numerous benefits, it is imperative for organizations to carefully evaluate the platform’s drawbacks before embarking on ERP projects. The inherent complexity of SAP is readily apparent and is a significant drawback. The process of implementing and customizing the system to align with the particular protocols of a firm can be a challenging endeavor. The complexity of this situation often leads to extended project durations and heightened resource requirements.
An other factor contributing to worry is the money aspect. The deployment of SAP systems incurs substantial initial charges, encompassing licensing fees, implementation costs, and ongoing maintenance prices. The cost limitations associated with SAP implementation may be excessively high for smaller enterprises, resulting in a hesitancy to adopt the system.
Azouri et al. (2022) conducted a case study in Lebanon and found that the user interface and functionality of SAP can pose challenges for individuals who are new to the system. Extensive training and change management measures may be necessary to address the intricacies of the system. The adoption process may experience delays due to employees’ resistance to change, which can be attributed to the significant learning curve involved. One other challenge that companies encounter pertains to their dependence on external consultants who possess specialized expertise in SAP. Although consultants play a crucial role in facilitating implementation and offering continuous support to organizations, over reliance on external specialists can lead to escalated costs and potential knowledge deficiencies within the organization.
The intrinsic standardization of SAP may impede an organization’s ability to adapt and respond quickly to changes. In order to tailor the system to particular requirements, customizations may need to be implemented. However, these modifications might incur significant expenses and introduce complexities in the maintenance of the system. The examination of SAP’s reputation and performance as a leading provider of ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) solutions can be comprehensively conducted by analyzing several elements within strategic, operational, and technological dimensions. The elucidation of SAP’s enduring performance in the global ERP industry necessitates a comprehensive examination of several pivotal factors.
The success of SAP can be attributed to its comprehensive offering of enterprise resource planning (ERP) modules that encompass a diverse range of organizational functions. The curriculum encompasses a range of courses including financial management, supply chain operations, human resources, and customer relationship management. The extensive functionality of SAP allows organizations to centralize and oversee multiple facets of their business operations under a unified and integrated system. The integration described herein serves to mitigate the requirement for disparate systems, so enhancing the uniformity of data and the efficiency of processes.
The extensive worldwide presence of SAP plays a pivotal role in its achievements. The organization possesses a wide-ranging network that encompasses several industries and geographic regions, hence fostering a sense of confidence and reliability among its clientele. Global enterprises appreciate SAP’s capacity to deliver consistent support and solutions across international boundaries, thereby solidifying its status as a prominent global leader in enterprise resource planning (ERP). The versatility of SAP is exemplified by its capacity to develop industry-specific solutions and templates tailored to the specific requirements of different sectors. These industry-specific alternatives allow companies to implement enterprise resource planning (ERP) solutions that closely align with their unique operational needs. Consequently, organizations have the ability to expedite the implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems by reducing the necessity for extensive adaptations, thereby enhancing the speed at which value is realized.
The steadfast dedication of SAP to research and development serves as a crucial catalyst for its sustained achievements in the long run. This dedication leads to a perpetual cycle of software changes and advancements inside its ecosystem. SAP provides organizations with the necessary tools to effectively leverage the latest developments inside their enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, while ensuring their continued alignment with prevailing technological trends. The continuous implementation of innovative practices enhances SAP’s overall value proposition, thereby positioning it favorably among consumers seeking state-of-the-art products. The popularity of SAP can be attributed to its proactive efforts in cultivating a broad ecosystem that include third-party applications, connectors, and certified partners. This ecosystem enables organizations to tailor SAP’s capabilities according to their own operational needs. The cultivation of adaptation and modification inside an organization promotes the overall effectiveness and usefulness of the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) solution.
The establishment of an extensive global support network consisting of certified partners and consultants is of paramount importance to SAP’s achievement. This network ensures that organizations undertaking ERP initiatives have convenient access to the knowledge and support necessary for successful implementation and ongoing maintenance. The provision of this support infrastructure fosters confidence among organizations seeking to use the potential of ERP systems. The success of SAP can be attributed to its inherent scalability. The Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system possesses the capacity to fulfill the requirements of both small-scale enterprises and large multinational corporations. The capacity to scale effectively ensures that organizations can rely on SAP to evolve alongside their expansion and evolving requirements, thereby promoting enduring partnerships.
SAP’s Business Intelligence (BI) solutions play a crucial role in facilitating data-driven decision-making by offering robust reporting and analytics capabilities. These technological advancements facilitate customers in acquiring significant insights from their data, thereby enhancing their ability to promptly adapt to evolving market conditions and rising trends. The history of SAP’s effective implementation of ERP systems across diverse industries and sectors enhances its standing as a provider of significant benefits to organizations. The impressive history of success in implementing ERP initiatives serves to foster confidence among businesses, underscoring SAP’s reputation as a reputable provider of choice for ERP solutions.
SAP’s commitment to effectively navigating the evolving landscape of regulatory changes and compliance requirements in various geographical regions and industries exemplifies its capacity for adaptation. The inherent flexibility of SAP-enabled organizations ensures their ability to navigate intricate regulatory environments proficiently, hence mitigating any potential disruptions to their operational processes. The specific requirements of individuals are emphasized, promoting the cultivation of adaptability and the ability to make modifications. Although SAP has achieved significant accomplishments, it has also faced challenges and setbacks in specific implementations. The intrinsic complexity of SAP, coupled with the sometimes substantial need for customization, can lead to project delays and exceedance of budgetary allocations. Inadequate management of customization endeavors may result in system instability, hence diminishing the advantages offered by the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. The significant upfront costs associated with SAP implementations may provide a barrier for smaller enterprises. Unforeseen expenditures during the implementation phase may also result in budgetary overruns, hence exerting financial strain.
Employees may exhibit resistance due to the considerable learning curve that is inherent in SAP’s user interface and capabilities. Insufficient implementation of change management practices might impede the adoption of users and hinder the realization of expected benefits. Organizations lacking internal competence in SAP may develop an excessive dependence on external consultants. Although the assistance provided by these specialists might be beneficial, dependence on them may result in knowledge deficiencies inside the business and a subsequent rise in consulting expenses. Although the standardization offered by SAP might be advantageous, it may also pose a drawback for organizations with distinctive or rapidly evolving operational procedures. The process of customizing SAP to align with specific needs might pose challenges, requiring additional resources and even causing delays..
Lessons learned and recommendations for organizations
A meticulous assessment of real-world enterprise resource planning (ERP) system implementations offers valuable insights into the intricacies and challenges that organizations face in their endeavor to enhance decision-making and optimize processes. These field lessons may provide valuable insights for organizations seeking to optimize their ERP initiatives and enhance their chances of achieving success.
A crucial lesson to be gleaned from this is the essential requirement for meticulous and thorough planning. Prior to commencing an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) project, organizations must engage in thorough planning to establish precise objectives and assess their unique requirements. The purpose of this pre-implementation analysis is to establish a solid foundation for a smoother process by comprehensively understanding current practices and future objectives. The ERP system serves as a framework for effectively aligning with the unique requirements of the organization.
The integration of change management has become an essential aspect of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) implementation. The examples involving Lidl and Hershey’s serve as clear illustrations of this issue. The reluctance of employees to embrace change can impede the advancement of initiatives and lead to disturbances. Consequently, it is imperative for organizations to develop robust change management strategies encompassing essential components such as training, effective communication, and active engagement of stakeholders. Ensuring the resolution of employees’ issues and fostering a culture that embraces adaptability are key aspects of achieving a successful Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) transition.
Another significant finding derived from these practical applications is the significance of scalability. Evaluating the scalability and adaptability of the selected enterprise resource planning (ERP) system is of utmost importance, particularly for large organizations. In addition, it is imperative for organizations to establish contingency strategies in order to effectively navigate unexpected challenges and adapt to evolving market conditions.
The US Navy case serves as an illustration of the significance of effective project governance and scope management as important criteria for achieving success. It is imperative for organizations to establish unique project governance frameworks, clearly delineate responsibilities and obligations, and adhere to industry-leading methodologies. Enhanced oversight and regulation of project scope can effectively mitigate the gradual expansion of project objectives, a common occurrence that often leads to financial overruns and timeline extensions.
The consideration of ERP implementations as ongoing processes is more appropriate than viewing them as isolated occurrences, as they require a continuous approach to improvement. The integration of routine assessments of key performance indicators (KPIs) ought to be deeply embedded within the organizational culture of the company. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) serve as navigational markers, providing guidance to organizations regarding areas that require enhancement and optimization.
Organizations have the ability to formulate a series of recommendations aimed at enhancing their enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation procedures, drawing from these aforementioned experiences. The initial step in the implementation process should involve doing a comprehensive analysis. By engaging key stakeholders at an early stage of the process, it becomes possible to identify crucial requirements and potential hazards. It is imperative for organizations to allocate resources towards robust change management strategies, encompassing elements such as comprehensive training programs, effective communication channels, and active engagement of stakeholders.
When engaging in ERP planning, it is imperative to incorporate concerns related to scalability. The assessment of the chosen ERP system’s ability to accommodate future expansion and evolving requirements is of utmost importance. It is imperative for organizations to have contingency plans in order to effectively address unforeseen challenges that may surface throughout the implementation process.
In order to achieve successful Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) efforts, it is imperative to establish and maintain effective project governance, manage the scope of the project, and adhere to industry best practices. It is imperative for organizations to establish rigorous project governance frameworks and clearly delineate roles and responsibilities. This ensures that Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) efforts remain aligned with strategic objectives and do not deviate from intended trajectories.
The cultivation of a culture centered on perpetual enhancement in the context of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems is of utmost importance. Organizations have the ability to identify areas for improvement and adjustment through the implementation of periodic evaluations against predetermined Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). In addition, the process of selecting a provider holds significant importance. The selection of ERP vendors should be predicated upon factors such as reputation, support, and scalability, rather than solely focusing on software capabilities.
Ultimately, the imperative lies in enhancing interdepartmental collaboration. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are most effective when they facilitate interdepartmental communication and the exchange of data. In order to fully harness the capabilities of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, it is imperative to minimize the presence of isolated functional units.
Ultimately, a comprehensive evaluation of SAP as a widely recognized enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution unveils a multifaceted landscape encompassing many advantages, limitations, potential areas for growth, and challenges. The success of SAP can be attributed to several key factors. Firstly, SAP offers a wide range of functionalities, allowing organizations to address various business needs. Additionally, SAP has a strong global presence, enabling it to serve customers across different regions. Moreover, SAP provides industry-specific solutions, catering to the unique requirements of different sectors. Furthermore, SAP maintains a culture of ongoing innovation, ensuring that its products and services remain up-to-date and relevant. Additionally, SAP benefits from a robust ecosystem, collaborating with partners to enhance its offerings. Moreover, SAP has a global support network, providing assistance to customers worldwide. Furthermore, SAP’s scalability allows organizations to adapt and grow as needed. Additionally, SAP offers robust reporting and analytics capabilities, enabling businesses to gain valuable insights from their data. Furthermore, SAP has a proven track record of delivering successful solutions to its customers. Lastly, SAP demonstrates adaptability to regulatory requirements, ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations. The combination of these attributes establishes SAP as a dependable and influential contender in the enterprise resource planning (ERP) industry, catering to diverse sectors and global enterprises.
Nevertheless, it is imperative to acknowledge that SAP is not exempt from imperfections and challenges. Due to its intricate nature and the need for extensive customization, this phenomenon has the potential to result in project delays and cost overruns. Smaller organizations may find the initial financial investment required for SAP systems to be prohibitive, while the considerable complexity of these systems may result in user hesitance. Moreover, organizations may develop an excessive dependence on external SAP consultants, leading to the emergence of knowledge deficiencies within the firm. The inherent homogeneity of SAP may impede flexibility and adaptability, hence requiring supplementary resources for necessary adjustments.
Successful SAP installations require comprehensive preparation, strategic foresight, effective project management, and a dedicated approach to problem-solving. Prior to initiating an enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation using SAP, firms should do a thorough assessment of their unique requirements, capabilities, and available resources. In addition, it is imperative to implement change management activities in order to facilitate the successful adaptation of users to novel procedures and technology.
Notwithstanding these challenges, the qualities and capabilities of SAP render it an attractive option for organizations seeking to enhance operational efficiency, enhance decision-making processes, and maintain a competitive advantage. The robust functionality of this technology empowers organizations to centralize and optimize their operations, resulting in enhanced efficiency and improved data coherence. The global presence and support network of SAP offer multinational organizations a sense of security by ensuring the provision of consistent service and solutions across international boundaries. Industry-specific solutions are designed to cater to the unique requirements of various industries, thereby reducing the necessity for significant modifications and expediting the implementation process. SAP remains at the forefront of technology trends with its commitment to continuous innovation, enabling organizations to access state-of-the-art solutions. The versatility and customisation options of SAP are further increased by a diverse ecosystem of third-party applications and interfaces.
Moreover, because to its inherent scalability, SAP is suitable for enterprises of varying sizes, ranging from small businesses to large multinational corporations. The reporting and analytics functionalities of the system provide users with valuable insights that can be utilized to make informed decisions based on data in a rapidly evolving business environment. The historical performance of SAP, coupled with its ability to adapt to regulatory modifications, enhances its standing as a dependable provider of enterprise resource planning (ERP) solutions.
SAP demonstrates ongoing adaptability within the dynamic realm of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, by developing solutions that effectively address the evolving requirements of contemporary businesses. Enterprises can effectively address the challenges and opportunities presented by digital transformation by leveraging SAP, owing to its strong dedication to innovation and specialized knowledge in several industries.
Ahmad, S. et al. (2020) “Towards sustainable textile and apparel industry: Exploring the role of Business intelligence systems in the era of Industry 4.0,” Sustainability, 12(7), p. 2632. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072632.
Azouri, M. et al. (2022) “Strategic assessment of factors that create a resistance to change during the implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems. The case of Lebanese organizations,” Arab Economic and Business Journal, 14(2), pp. 18–30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.38039/2214-4625.1015.
Chatti, H., Radouche, T., & Asfoura, E. (2021). Framework for the evaluation of the ERP implementation success: Case study in SMEs. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 24(4), 1-25.
Dolfing, H. (2022) Case Study 12: Lidl’s €500 Million SAP Debacle. Available at: https://www.henricodolfing.com/2020/05/case-study-lidl-sap-debacle.html.
Evans, P.C. and Annunziata, M., 2012. Industrial internet: Pushing the boundaries. General Electric Reports, pp.488-508.
Hustad, E. et al. (2021) “Moving enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems to the cloud: the challenge of infrastructural embeddedness,” International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 8(1), pp. 5–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm080101.
Jacobides, M.G. (2022) “How to Compete When Industries Digitize and Collide: An Ecosystem Development framework,” California Management Review, 64(3), pp. 99–123. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256221083352.
Jiménez, A. et al. (2020) “Unpacking Water Governance: a framework for practitioners,” Water, 12(3), p. 827. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030827.
Nyckel, E.-M. (2020) “‘Digital Taylorism’? Data Practices and governance in the enterprise software salesforce,” 9, 9, p. 31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.34669/wi.ws/9.
Otoom, A.F. et al. (2019) “Success factors importance based on software project organization structure,” Information, 10(12), p. 391. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/info10120391.
Subramanian, G.H. (2022) “ERP implementation model, findings and its applications to organisations: an exploratory case analysis,” International Journal of Business Information Systems, 41(2), p. 177. Available at https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbis.2022.126134.
United States Government Accountability Office (2005) DOD BUSINESS SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION: Navy ERP Adherence to Best Business Practices Critical to Avoid Past Failures. GAO-05-858. GAO. Available at: https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-05-858.pdf
Wirtz, J. et al. (2022) “Corporate digital responsibility in service firms and their ecosystems,” Journal of Service Research, 26(2), pp. 173–190. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705221130467.
Zhang, H. and Zheng, H. (2019) “An empirical study on the impact of ERP implementation on the performance of listed companies,” Journal of Physics, 1213(5), p. 052103. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1213/5/052103.