Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course Name
Date
Are Self-Driving Cars Good or Bad for Society
Can you imagine taking a rest and driving at the same time? While this may appear to be a strange idea, it may become a reality in the near future. In reality, Google Inc. has been working on self-driving vehicle models since the year 2009, and the company hopes to have the vehicles available to the general public sooner rather than later [1]. Because the vehicles operate autonomously, they do not require the steering wheels. Instead, they rely on laser sensors and radars for guidance. While this may appear to be risky, there is evidence that these vehicles are safer than those we have today. In reality, Google’s self-driving vehicles will not only improve public safety but will also reduce traffic and improve people’s wellbeing.
Summary
One way in which driverless cars will improve public safety is by reducing human error in driving. Streets and roads will be made safer because drivers who are driving while intoxicated will be removed [2]. Furthermore, people frequently drive while exhausted, which can impair judgment and result in a fender bender. These vehicles due to their potential can and will revolutionize transportation [3]. The vast majority of people most of the time get annoyed for sometimes getting locked by swarm of vehicles. Lounging around consumes resources such as time which obviously leads to frustration. This would not only make driving more efficient, but it might also help with saving money on gas.
The problem of traffic jams in cities and highways might be also partially solved. According to Gillmore et al. (2020), grouping a larger portion of self-driving vehicles once many are out in the market can make them form a platoon of vehicles. As a result, “the negative consequences of unpredictable traffic could be avoided” [4]. Furthermore, it has been observed that this platooning “would take into account smoother traffic streams, lessened extended drive times, and even increase roadway limit,” and expanding interstate limit would set aside public authority cash.
Google’s vehicles have a fantastic arrangement to bring to the community which includes wellbeing, comfort, relaxation and many others which will be of help to them. In any case, some may argue that they are expensive. While this is true, it is also true that the significant cost will most likely begin to decrease as the vehicles are adopted by the general population [5]. For instance, when PDAs originally hit the market, they were more costly than standard PDAs. Most people could not afford them thought they offered more functionalities [6]. Right now, in the ground, because they are so well known, most remote associations offer telephones at lower costs to draw in more clients.
Conclusion
Given the benefits that Google’s self-driving vehicles will bring to the table in terms of both security and reducing rush hour gridlock, it is clear that they will fundamentally change the future. Vehicles influence virtually every facet of daily life because they are most common mode of transportation [7]. Therefore having said that, then innovation creates a big space for making voyages more powerful, it should unquestionably be welcomed. Furthermore, the use of these vehicles, as it will be seen in their work, will help to develop the confidence of a driver confidence as well as the confidence of pedestrians. As a result, this has the potential to alter the way people live. To be honest, it gives out more advantages to person lives, which will be of help in saving them from misfortunates caused by other vehicles.
References
1. Hecht, Jeff. Lidar for self-driving cars. 2018. Optics and Photonics News 29, 1 (Jan 2018), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPN.29.1.000026
2. Shalev-Shwartz Shai, Shaked Shammah, and Amnon Shashua. 2017. On a formal model of safe and scalable self-driving cars. (October 2017). Retrieved October 29 from ArXiv preprint arXiv:1708.06374.
3. Robert, Lionel P. 2019. Are automated vehicles safer than manually driven cars? Ai & Society 34, 3 (May 2019), 687-688. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.748246
4. Gillmore Samineh C., and Nathan L. Tenhundfeld. 2020. The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly: Evaluating Tesla’s Human Factors in the Wild West of Self-Driving Cars. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 64, 1 (Jun 2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181320641020
5. Teoh Eric R., and David G. Kidd. 2017. Rage against the machine? Google’s self-driving cars versus human drivers.” Journal of Safety Research 63, (Dec 2017), 57-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2017.08.008
6. Rabino, Samuel, Gabay, Gillie, Moskowitz, David et al. 2010. Assessing pricing for a new
product concept: PDA electronic health records real-time monitoring. J Direct Data Digit Mark Pract 12, (Aug 2010), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1057/dddmp.2010.11
7. Lutin, Jerome M., Alain L. Kornhauser, and Eva Lerner-Lam MASCE. 2013. The revolutionary development of self-driving vehicles and implications for the transportation engineering profession.” Institute of Transportation Engineers. ITE Journal 83, 7 (July 2013), 28.
